AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIESEAN WHITE, ET AL., appellants, v. ABERCIO MARADIAGA, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, and the cross motion is denied, the service effectuated on the defendant on March 29, 2003, is deemed to have been timely made, filing of proof thereof to April 1, 2003, is granted nunc pro tunc, and the defendant's time to serve and file an answer is enlarged until 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order.

As the delay in service of the summons and complaint was minimal and the defendant failed to demonstrate that any prejudice resulted therefrom, the plaintiffs' motion should have been granted ( see Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini Spencer, 97 N.Y.2d 95).

SANTUCCI, J.P., H. MILLER, LUCIANO, CRANE and SPOLZINO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITE v. MARADIAGA
(Jun 21, 2004)