AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

NICHOLAS J. STEN, Appellant, v. TODD DESROCHER ET AL., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LAHTINEN, J.

Plaintiff appeals to this Court (see CPLR 5703 [b]) from County Court's affirmance (see UJCA 1701, 1807) of a City Court judgment dismissing his small claims action in which he sought compensation for damage to his car sustained in a motor vehicle accident. "The standard of review in small claims cases is limited to whether `substantial justice has not been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law'" (Moses v. Randolph, 236 A.D.2d 706, 707, quoting UJCA 1807;see Jacobson v. Sassower, 66 N.Y.2d 991, 993; Borman v. Purvis, 299 A.D.2d 615, 616). Here, City Court heard testimony from plaintiff, defendant Todd Desrocher (hereinafter defendant) and a State Trooper who investigated the accident. There was evidence indicating that defendant was operating his vehicle in a reasonably prudent fashion and City Court credited that proof. City Court's determination that plaintiff failed to meet his burden of proving any negligence by defendant was not clearly erroneous or "so shocking as to not be substantial justice" ( Blair v. Five Points Shopping Plaza, 51 A.D.2d 167, 169). The remaining arguments have been considered and found meritless.

Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STEN v. DESROCHER
(Jun 24, 2004)