AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN THE MATTER OF MARK DRUCKER, appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY AGENCY FISA, respondent.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

On January 29, 2002, the New York City Financial Information Services Agency (hereinafter FISA) determined that the petitioner was not entitled to accrue sick leave or annual leave as of the date he applied for disability retirement. In a letter dated December 19, 2002, the Comptroller of the City of New York (hereinafter the Comptroller), in effect, determined that FISA was correct. On December 11, 2002, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review FISA's January 29, 2002, determination.

The Supreme Court granted that branch of FISA's cross motion which was to dismiss the proceeding for failure to state a cause of action, and the petitioner appeals.

At the time that the petitioner commenced this proceeding, the Comptroller's determination, contained in the letter dated December 19, 2002, which the Supreme Court properly found to be the "final" determination as to the petitioner's entitlement to sick and annual leave accruals from the time he applied for disability retirement, had not yet been rendered. Accordingly, the proceeding was premature ( see Matter of Pheasant Pond Owners Assn. v. Board of Trustees of Inc. Vil. of Southhampton, 285 A.D.2d 597).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.

SMITH, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and TOWNES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DRUCKER v. NEW YORK CITY AGENCY FISA
(Jun 28, 2004)