AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JEFFREY L. KINZLER, ETC., respondent, v. PETER KENNY, ET AL., appellants.

DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that on the court's own motion, the notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal, and leave to appeal is granted ( see CPLR 5701[c]); and it is further,

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the provisions thereof which treated the notice of petition as a notice of motion for summary judgment and awarded summary judgment to the plaintiff are vacated.

While the Supreme Court correctly converted the proceeding to a plenary action ( see CPLR 103[c]; Matter of Phalen v. Theatrical Protective Union, 22 N.Y.2d 34, cert denied 393 U.S. 1000), the court exceeded its authority by sua sponte converting the petition into a motion for summary judgment and awarding summary judgment to the plaintiff ( see Taskiran v. Murphy, 8 A.D.3d 361 [2d Dept, June 7, 2004]; Matter of Ferraro v. Gordon, 1 A.D.3d 595; Katz v. Waitkins, 306 A.D.2d 442; Skyline Enters. of N.Y. Corp. v. Amuran Realty Co., 288 A.D.2d 292).

In light of our determination, we need not reach the defendants' remaining contentions.

SANTUCCI, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KINZLER v. KENNY
(Jun 28, 2004)