AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re HERITAGE BOND LITIGATION. Da v. d Sinow, Howard Preston, Langdon Parrill, Ray Stits, Barrett Anderson, Laurence Pilgeram, Scott McKenry, Ralph Allman, and Gilbert Ki

ORDER ON CLASS PLAINTIFFS' EX-PARTE APPLICATION TO STRIKE THE OPPOSITION OF THE KASIRER DEFENDANTS TO THE MOTION TO COMPEL OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO ALLOW CLASS PLAINTIFFS' TO FILE A RESPONSE

ROSALYN CHAPMAN, Magistrate Judge

After considering the arguments set forth Class Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application to strike the opposition papers of the Kasirer defendants or, in the alternative, to allow Class Plaintiffs to file a response to the opposition papers, for good cause, and Kasirer defendants partial opposition,

The Court hereby grants the Ex-Parte application and strikes the opposition papers filed by the Kasirer defendants in their entirety.

The Court hereby grants the Ex Parte application and gives Class Plaintiffs permission to file a response to the opposition papers of the Kasirer defendants. The response must be filed by July 19, 2004.

It is so Ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE HERITAGE BOND LITIGATION
(Jul 14, 2004)