AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. Plaintiff v. MOTOROLA, INC. Defendant, Counterclaim Plaintiff.

ORDER

LEONARD DAVIS, District Judge

Before the Court is Motorola's Motion for Protective Order (Docket No. 165). Having considered the parties' submissions and oral argument, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART said motion. The Court GRANTS Motorola's motion for protective order with respect to Interrogatory 31. The Court DENIES Motorola's motion for protective order with respect to the 30(b)(6) testimony. Because the motion is granted in part and denied in part, the Court does not assess costs and fees pursuant to the order of July 12, 2004 (Docket No. 167).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STMICROELECTRONICS, INC. v. MOTOROLA, INC., (E.D.Tex. 2004)
(Jul 19, 2004)