Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his convictions is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v. Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15). The defendant conceded that while holding a shotgun to the victim he told him to "empty his pockets." Moreover, two eyewitnesses testified that a codefendant placed his hand in the deceased's pocket. This was sufficient evidence from which the jury could conclude that the defendant acted with larcenous intent ( see People v. Bracey, 41 NY2d 296, 300-301).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).
The contentions raised in the defendant's supplemental pro se brief either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.