AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JOHN and JANE DOE 2, Indi v. dually and as Guardians Ad Litem of MINOR CHILD DOE 2, Plaintiffs,

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

JAMES BEATY, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Eli Lilly Company's and Defendant Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Inc.'s Motions to Dismiss [Documents #1, #11] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Eli Lilly's Motion to Dismiss [Document #1] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' claims against Eli Lilly are therefore DISMISSED. Accordingly, to the extent that Eli Lilly brings any other Motions, these Motions are DENIED as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ortho-Clinical's Motion to Dismiss [Document #11] pursuant to Rule 12(b)(7) is DENIED.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Ortho-Clinical's Alternative Motion to Stay [Document #11] is DENIED. Plaintiffs and Defendant Ortho-Clinical are therefore DIRECTED to proceed with this case in accordance with the normal pretrial procedures in the Middle District of North Carolina.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DOE v. ORTHO-CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, INC. (M.D.N.C. 2004)
(Sep 3, 2004)