PER CURIAM.
On January 27, 2004, the trial court entered an order terminating the parental rights of Sherrell Corprew to her daughter pursuant to Code § 16.1-283(B) and 16.1-283(C)(2). On appeal, Corprew contends the trial court made no explicit finding that termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the child. Upon reviewing the record and briefs of the parties, we conclude this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the decision of the trial court. See Rule 5A:27.
A termination of parental rights pursuant to either Code § 16.1-283(B) or Code § 16.1-283(C)(2) requires a finding, upon clear and convincing evidence, that termination is "in the best interests of the child." Code § 16.1-283(B) and 16.1-283(C)(2). Although the written statement of facts in this case did not state the trial court found termination was in the best interests of the child, the trial court's order terminating Corprew's parental rights states the trial court, based upon clear and convincing evidence, found it was in the child's best interests to terminate Corprew's parental rights. "[T]rial courts speak only through their written orders and . . . such orders are presumed to reflect accurately what transpired." McMillion v. Dryvit Systems, Inc., 262 Va. 463, 469, 552 S.E.2d 364, 367 (2001).
The record demonstrates the trial court made the necessary findings to support termination pursuant to Code § 16.1-283(B) and 16.1-283(C)(2). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's ruling.
To the extent Corprew argues the trial court failed to consider certain factors in determining termination was in the child's best interests, the record does not reflect Corprew raised this argument in the trial court. "The Court of Appeals will not consider an argument on appeal which was not presented to the trial court." Ohree v. Commonwealth, 26 Va. App. 299, 308, 494 S.E.2d 484, 488 (1998). See Rule 5A:18. Accordingly, Rule 5A:18 bars our consideration of this question on appeal. Moreover, the record does not reflect any reason to invoke the good cause or ends of justice exceptions to Rule 5A:18.
Affirmed.