AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

RACHEL HAAS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. QUEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC., et al., Defendants.

ORDER

JAMES GWIN, District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant the State of Ohio's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 36], to which Plaintiffs Rachel, Carol, and Richard Haas have responded [Doc. 43] and Defendant the State of Ohio has replied [Doc. 46]. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

Also pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion to Amend Pleadings [Doc. 43]. For the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, the Motion to Amend is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HAAS v. QUEST RECOVERY SERVICES, INC. (N.D.Ohio 2004)
(Sep 20, 2004)