AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOHN M.J. MADEY, Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, Defendant.

ORDER

JAMES BEATY, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Partial Motions for Summary Judgment [Documents #63, #65] are DENIED.

However, the parties are granted leave to file additional dispositive motions related to the government license defense and the 28 U.S.C. § 1498 defense in accordance with the Court's instructions in Sections III.B.2.b and III.B.3 of the accompanying Memorandum Opinion. The Court establishes the following timetable for these motions:

1. Any motions must be filed within 60 days of the issuance of this Court's Order. The motion and accompanying brief must comply with the requirements of Local Rules 7.3 and 56.1.
2. Any Response must be filed in accordance with Local Rules 7.3 and 56.1.
3. Any Reply must be filed in accordance with Local Rules 7.3 and 56.1.

It is further ORDERED that the parties are given an additional 45 days from the date of this Order to supplement their discovery responses and pretrial disclosures.

After the Court issues a ruling on the supplemental motions filed pursuant to this Order, the Court will schedule a status conference to determine the future scheduling for any further proceeding related to this matter.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MADEY v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
(Sep 20, 2004)