AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., and SAMSUNG AUSTIN SEMICONDUCTOR, L.P., Defendants.

ORDER

WILLIAM J. MARTINI, District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on defendants Samsung Electronics Co., et al.'s appeal of Magistrate Judge Hedges' July 7, 2004 and September 1, 2004 Orders. After having considered the parties' submissions, and for the reasons set forth in the Court's accompanying Letter Opinion, and for good cause shown,

IT IS on this 1st day of October 2004 hereby,

ORDERED that defendants' appeal is DENIED, and the representative parts/assumptions sanctions imposed by Magistrate Judge Hedges in his July 7, 2004 Order are AFFIRMED, and MODIFIED to require that plaintiff select at least one NMOS DRAM as a representative part.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOSAID TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD
(Oct 1, 2004)