It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the motion is granted.
Memorandum: Following our decision that, inter alia, granted that part of plaintiff's motion seeking summary judgment on liability in this mortgage foreclosure action ( United Cos. Lending Corp. v. Candela, 292 AD2d 800), plaintiff inadvertently allowed the notice of pendency to expire without moving for an extension. When plaintiff sought to file a second notice of pendency in the office of the Clerk of Onondaga County, that notice was rejected, and Supreme Court thereafter denied plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second notice of pendency. As we recently held in Atlantic Mtge. Inv. Corp. v. Wynn ( 8 AD3d 1114), the filing of successive notices of pendency is permissible in mortgage foreclosure actions ( see Horowitz v. Griggs, 2 AD3d 404; Campbell v. Smith, 309 AD2d 581; cf. Matter of Sakow, 97 NY2d 436). We therefore reverse the order and grant plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second notice of pendency.