Insurance — law enforcement liability policy — sexual assaults by officer
The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case is reversed for the reason stated in the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals that a law enforcement liability insurance policy did not provide coverage for sexual assaults by a police officer after traffic stops and an accident investigation because the officer did not commit the sexual assaults "while performing law enforcement duties" as required for coverage under the policy.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
REVERSED.