Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father's contention, the Family Court properly reduced his childcare obligation and correctly calculated an overpayment of $180. The Hearing Examiner's determination was supported by the record ( see Matter of Culton v. Parker, 4 AD3d 471).
The issues raised by the father with respect to the arrears set forth in a separate order dated May 23, 2002, are not properly before this Court, as he did not appeal from the order denying his objections to that order ( see Matter of Roman v. Roman, 8 AD3d 394; Matter of Kirdahy v. Scalia, 301 AD2d 525, 526).
The father's remaining contentions are without merit.