AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARD JORDAN, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the prosecutor's summation deprived him of due process and a fair trial. However, the majority of the defendant's current objections are not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Dien, 77 NY2d 885, 886; People v. Brownridge, 267 AD2d 318). In any event, the prosecutor's statements constituted fair responses to remarks made by the defense counsel during summation ( see People v. Halm, 81 NY2d 819, 821; People v. Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105; People v. Ryant, 278 AD2d 345).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. JORDAN
(Oct 12, 2004)