Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Family Court properly denied the mother's objections to the order dated August 20, 2003. The father demonstrated that a substantial, unanticipated, and unreasonable change in circumstances warranted a downward modification of his child support obligation, specifically, the dissolution of his business through no fault of his own ( see Matter of Beal v. Beal, 270 AD2d 256; Matter of Morena v. Morena, 267 AD2d 388; Matter of Meyer v. Meyer, 205 AD2d 784).
The mother's remaining contentions are without merit.