BERGER v. STATE OFFICE FOR SERV. TO CHILDREN FAM

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

BW04593; A117292.

Attorney(S)

Peter Miller argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Richard D. Wasserman, Attorney-in-Charge, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MICHAEL BERGER, Petitioner, v. STATE OFFICE FOR SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion case to Berger v. SOSCF (A117291), 195 Or App 587, 98 P3d 1127 (Oct 13, 2004). Petitioner seeks judicial review of an agency order under ORS 183.482, asserting that he was entitled to a contested case hearing before the agency issued the order. In Berger (A117291), we held that petitioner was not entitled to a contested case hearing and that the proper method for reviewing the final order at issue was by a petition for review under ORS 183.484 in circuit court. As a result of that holding, we conclude that neither ORS 183.482 nor any other statute gives us jurisdiction over this case. We therefore dismiss the petition for review.

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

MICHAEL BERGER, Petitioner, v. STATE OFFICE FOR SERVICES TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Respondent.

Comments