Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH E. WOLF, ET AL., Defendants.

ORDER

JOE HEATON, District Judge

Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel the corporate defendants and defendants Eric Wolf and Louise Qualls to respond to its discovery requests. Defendants have responded to the motion. The Court concludes plaintiff's motion should be granted in part and denied in part.

Defendants Eric Wolf and Louise Qualls are ORDERED to respond to those interrogatories and requests for production of documents which involve information related to them personally and to their personal finances within 30 days of this order. In addition, as personal representatives of TSI Installers and Erectors, Inc. and Titan Management, Inc., defendant Qualls and defendant Eric Wolf are ORDERED to respond to those interrogatories and requests for production of documents related to those two corporations within 30 days of this order. Plaintiff's motion to compel is otherwise DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. WOLF
(Oct 18, 2004)