AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WÄRTSILÄ NSD NORTH AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 56

STANLEY BROTMAN, Senior District Judge

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the Motion of J. Ian Downes, Esquire and M. Frances Ryan, Esquire, of the law firm of Dechert, LLP, on behalf of Defendant Hill International, Inc., seeking summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as to the remaining claims of negligence, fraud, and breach of contract as set forth in Plaintiff Wartsila NSD North America Inc.'s Amended Complaint; and

THE COURT having fully considered the submissions of the parties; and

THE COURT having conducted oral argument on October 20, 2004; and

FOR THE REASONS stated in an Opinion of the Court filed on even date.

ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is DENIED.

No costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WARTSILA NSD NORTH AMERICA, INC. v. HILL INTERNATIONAL, INC. (D.N.J. 2004)
(Oct 29, 2004)