Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the Supreme Court erred in admitting testimony of a "prompt outcry" of sexual assault ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Tevaha, 84 NY2d 879; People v. Medina, 53 NY2d 951). In any event, the Supreme Court properly admitted the testimony ( see People v. Shelton, 1 NY3d 614; People v. McDaniel, 81 NY2d 10).
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.