AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

DIANE BENNETT, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellant.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. Plaintiff's notice of claim provided information sufficient to apprise defendant New York City Transit Authority of the place, time and nature of her accident in order to "investigate, collect evidence and evaluate the merit of [the] claim" ( see Brown v. City of New York, 95 NY2d 389, 392). Moreover, triable issues of fact exist whether the Transit Authority had constructive notice that a continuing water condition existed on the platform of its subway station and negligently failed to remedy it.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals ( 22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BENNETT v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY
(Nov 18, 2004)