Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiff's motion for leave to renew since she did not offer a reasonable justification for her failure to submit the additional evidence presented upon renewal in opposition to the defendant's original motion for summary judgment or its motion for leave to reargue ( see CPLR 2221 [e] [3]; Caramoor Capital Group v. Blauner, 302 AD2d 550; Falkowitz v. Peters, 294 AD2d 330; Matter of Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Nevelus, 292 AD2d 381).