Defendant's speedy trial arguments are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Defendant's motion stated in conclusory terms that certain periods were chargeable to the People, and when the People identified the exclusions upon which they intended to rely, defendant offered no response ( see People v. Goode, 87 NY2d 1045). Were we to review these claims, we would find that the motion was properly denied. The adjournment of June 7, 2000, which is dispositive of the speedy trial issue, was excludable because on June 7 the court decided defendant's omnibus motion and the People were entitled to a reasonable time to prepare for trial ( see People v. Green, 90 AD2d 705, lv denied 58 NY2d 784), constituting "a reasonable period of delay resulting from . . . pre-trial motions" within the meaning of CPL 30.30 (4) (a).