AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

THOMAS P. LEWIS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant.

S. THOMAS ANDERSON, Magistrate Judge

ORDER DENYING SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO QUASH

Before the Court is Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell, and Berkowitz, P.C.'s ("Baker Donelson") Supplemental Motion to Quash Defendant's Subpoena for Production of Documents and Notice to Take Deposition filed on August 17, 2004. United States District Judge J. Daniel Breen referred this matter to the Magistrate Judge for determination. Because the Court has already entered an Order denying Baker Donelson's original Motion to Quash, the current Supplemental Motion to Quash is DENIED as moot.

Pursuant to the Order of Reference, any objections to this Order shall be made in writing within ten days after service of this Order and shall set forth with particularity those portions of the Order objected to and the reasons for those objections.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEWIS v. U.S
(Dec 6, 2004)