Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to charge the jury that the defense of justification is available to an initial aggressor if her or she withdraws from the encounter and effectively communicates that withdrawal to the other person, but the latter persists in continuing the incident by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force. This claim is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Barrett, 11 AD3d 551), and, under the circumstances of this case, we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction.