Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant's contention on appeal, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying her motion for leave to serve a supplemental summons and amended complaint ( see CPLR 3025 [b]; Leszczynski v. Kelly McGlynn, 281 AD2d 519, 520; Heckler Elec. Co. v. Matrix Exhibits-N.Y., 278 AD2d 279; cf. Pirrotti Pirrotti, LLP v. Estate of Warm, 8 AD3d 545, 546; Fuentes v. City of New York, 3 AD3d 549, 550).