Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

ANTHONY HOOVER, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS J. KEITH, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

JAMES BEATY, District Judge

On November 9, 2004, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in this action and a copy was given to the court.

Within the time limitation set forth in the statute, Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation.

The court will treat Plaintiff's "notices of appeal" as an Objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

The court has appropriately reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint [Pleading no. 2] be DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). A judgment dismissing this action will be entered contemporaneously with this Order.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HOOVER v. KEITH
(Jan 4, 2005)