The court properly delivered a consciousness-of-guilt charge, since defendant's abandonment, at the approach of the police, of a paper bag later discovered to contain heroin, as well as his struggle with the police before being handcuffed, provided a sufficient evidentiary predicate for such a charge ( see People v. Yazum, 13 NY2d 302, 304; see also People v. Alexander, 37 NY2d 202, 203). Any ambiguity in defendant's conduct was for the jury to consider. Defendant's challenge to the language of the consciousness-of-guilt charge is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the charge conveyed the proper standards.
We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.