AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

VERNE LEE WHALEY, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of manufacture or delivery of less than one gram of cocaine. The trial court sentenced appellant, in accordance with the jury's recommendation, to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and assessed a $10,000 fine. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. Appellant retained counsel to represent him on appeal. Counsel filed a motion to withdraw from her representation of appellant because, after reviewing the record, she concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit, purportedly under the authority of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967). The Anders procedural safeguards are not applicable, however, to an appellant who is represented by a retained attorney. See Nguyen v. State, 11 S.W.3d 376, 379 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, no pet.). This court granted counsel's motion to withdraw, and ordered that appellant had thirty days to file a pro se brief or to obtain new counsel to file a brief on his behalf. More than thirty days have elapsed, and appellant has not filed a pro se brief, had an attorney file a brief on his behalf, or responded to this court's order. Accordingly, we review this case without the benefit of briefs. We have reviewed the record on appeal and agree with appellant's former appellate attorney that the appeal lacks merit. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. See Nguyen, 11 S.W. 3d at 379-80.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHALEY v. STATE, 14-04-00835-CR (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005)
(Jan 27, 2005)