AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, Appellant.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Public Authorities Law created the Long Island Power Authority (hereinafter LIPA) and empowered it to acquire all or part of the assets of the Long Island Lighting Company (hereinafter LILCO) ( see Public Authorities Law § 1020 et seq.).

Pursuant to its rights and obligations, LIPA entered into a merger agreement to acquire LILCO's assets, including "all franchise and utility service responsibilities for all ultimate consumers of gas and electricity within LILCO's former service territory" (Public Authorities Law § 1020-g [n]). The Public Authorities Law also empowered LIPA to enter into contracts with municipalities, and thus the entity was able to assume the franchises ( see Public Authorities Law § 1020-f [h]). The franchises at issue included the responsibility to pay all costs associated with removal, protection, and relocation work for LIPA's utility equipment during municipal public works projects ( see Matter of Diamond Asphalt Corp. v. Sander, 92 NY2d 244). Contrary to LIPA's contention, there is no indication that the Legislature intended that it be exempt from this obligation based on its status as a corporate municipal instrumentality and political subdivision of the State of New York ( see Public Authorities Law §§ 1020-c, 1020-f [h]; § 1020-g [n]).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CITY OF N.Y. v. LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY
(Jan 31, 2005)