AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

THOMAS F. LIOTTI, Respondent, v. ERNEST J. PEACE, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted and the order dated August 13, 2003, is vacated.

A party seeking to vacate a default is required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious cause of action or defense ( see CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). It is within the discretion of the Supreme Court, in the interest of justice, to excuse a default resulting from law-office failure ( see CPLR 2005). Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant Ernest J. Peace established a reasonable excuse that he mistakenly diaried the place of the pretrial conference ( see CPLR 2005; Crystal Run Sand Gravel v. Milnor Constr. Corp., 301 AD2d 491). This was an isolated incident of non-appearance ( see Kingsland Group v. Satcin Realty Corp., 287 AD2d 440), and there was no evidence that the default was willful ( see Beizer v. Funk, 5 AD3d 619). Moreover, Peace arguably has a meritorious defense ( see Gross v. New York Times Co., 82 NY2d 146, 152-54). Accordingly, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LIOTTI v. PEACE
(Feb 14, 2005)