Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, rendering the sufficiency of the opposition of the respondents Barry H. Klein and Saint-Jean Simean academic ( see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Valore v. McIntosh, 8 AD3d 662).
Here, the plaintiff's admission that she crossed a busy Manhattan intersection while "looking straight ahead and walking for the entire time," raises a triable issue of fact as to whether she acted with reasonable care given all of the circumstances ( see Thoma v. Ronai, 82 NY2d 736, 737; Schmidt v. Flickinger Co., 88 AD2d 1068, 1069; see also Garner v. Fox, 265 AD2d 525).