Inasmuch as plaintiffs were not parties to the land disposition agreement, and the agreement contained a provision expressly negating any intent to permit its enforcement by third parties, plaintiffs were without standing to prosecute their causes seeking relief under the agreement ( see Nepco Forged Prods., Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 99 AD2d 508; cf. Concerned Cooper Gramercy Tenants' Assn. v. New York City Educ. Constr. Fund, 13 AD3d 61).
We have considered plaintiffs' remaining contentions and find them unavailing.