Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LEE WRIGHT, Defendant.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER RE: WAIVER OF DETENTION PENDING TRIAL

JAN M. ADLER, Magistrate Judge

On February 25, 2005, in accordance with the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), the Court was set to determine whether defendant Christopher Lee Wright ("Defendant") should be held in custody without bail pending trial and, if convicted, sentencing in the above-captioned matter. Assistant United States Attorney Christopher M. Alexander appeared on behalf of the United States; Zaki Zehawi of Federal Defenders of San Diego appeared on behalf of Defendant and his appointed counsel, Russell Babcock.

At the hearing, Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his right, on the record and through counsel, to the setting of bail and a detention hearing. Based on that waiver, the Court orders that Defendant be detained pending trial and, if convicted, sentencing in these matters, without prejudice or waiver of the Defendant's right to later apply for bail and conditions of release, and without prejudice of a waiver of the right of the United States to seek detention in the event of an application by Defendant for such relief.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant be detained pending trial and, if convicted, sentencing in these matters.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practical, from persons awaiting or serving sentence or being held in custody pending appeal. Defendant shall be afforded a reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

While in custody, upon order of a court of the United States or upon the request of an attorney for the United States, the person in charge of the correctional facility shall deliver the Defendant to the United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding or any other appearance stipulated to by defense and government counsel.

This order is made without prejudice to modification by this Court and without prejudice to Defendant's exercise of his right to bail and a detention hearing at a future date.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. WRIGHT
(Mar 1, 2005)