AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In the Matter of JOY BUILDERS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN PLANNING BOARD et al., Appellants.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

As a general rule, we do not consider an issue on a subsequent appeal that was raised, or could have been raised, on an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution, although this Court has inherent jurisdiction to do so ( see Rubeo v. National Grange Mut. Ins. Co., 93 NY2d 750; Bray v. Cox, 38 NY2d 350; Paniccia v. Long Is. R.R. Co., 297 AD2d 366). Here, the appellants appealed, by permission, from an order dated July 23, 2003, denying their motion to dismiss the petition on res judicata grounds based on a prior determination by Justice Weiner at the Supreme Court, Rockland County, in another case. The appeal was later dismissed by this Court for failure to prosecute (App Div Docket No. 2001-05258). We decline to exercise our discretion to address the appellants' argument as to the effect of Justice Weiner's prior order on the present petition, an issue no different than the res judicata issue which could have been raised on the prior appeal.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE OF JOY BUILDERS
(Mar 7, 2005)