Presented with numerous inconsistencies as to whether the accident actually happened in the manner alleged by plaintiffs, the jury was in the best position to evaluate these credibility issues ( see generally Grassi v. Sea Shore Rest., 2 AD3d 222). The verdict was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see Kane v. Coundorous, 11 AD3d 304). The court properly denied plaintiffs' request to introduce a prior consistent statement, since the record supports the conclusion that attacks on the injured party's credibility were not based on a recent fabrication.