AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

HARRY GOLDSTEIN et al., Appellants, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KOHL'S, Respondent.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, and it is declared that the lease was properly terminated.

An application for a Yellowstone injunction ( see First Natl. Stores v. Yellowstone Shopping Ctr., 21 NY2d 630), must be made prior to the termination of the lease, as courts cannot reinstate a lease after the lapse of the time specified to cure a default ( id. at 638; see King Party Ctr. of Pitkin Ave. v. Minco Realty, 286 AD2d 373, 375; Long Is. Gynecological Servs. v. 1103 Stewart Ave. Assoc. Ltd. Partnership, 224 AD2d 591, 593). Contrary to the appellants' contentions, their motion for a Yellowstone injunction was untimely since they commenced this action after the defendant properly issued a notice of termination of the lease.

Furthermore, the notice to cure and the notice of termination prepared by the defendant's in-house senior attorney were properly served, as the appellants did not reject the notice and acted on the notice immediately ( see Rogers v. New York Tel. Co., 74 AD2d 526).

In opposition to the defendant's prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on that branch of its cross motion which was summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the appellants failed to raise a triable issue of fact, including, inter alia, whether the defendant breached the lease and whether the appellants were in default on the lease.

The appellants' remaining contentions are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDSTEIN v. KOHL'S
(Mar 28, 2005)