JOHN DOE I v. UNOCAL CORPORATION

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 00-56603, 00-57197, 00-56628, 00-57195.

Attorney(S)

Julie Shaprio, Esq., Tacoma, WA, Anne Richardson, Esq., Hadsell Stormer, Pasadena, CA, Judith Brown Chomsky, Esq., Elkins Park, PA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants. Jennifer Green, Esq., New York, NY, Paul L. Hoffman, Esq., Schonbrun, Desimone, Seplow, Harris and Hoffman, LLP, Venice, CA, Katharine J. Redford, Esq., Wellesley, MA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Defendants-Appellees. Edwin V. Woodsome, Jr., Esq., Howrey Simon Arnold White, LLP., O'Melveny Myers L.L.P., Peter H. Mason, Esq., Fulbright Jaworski, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Judges

Mary Murphy Schroeder
Stephen Roy Reinhardt
Alex Kozinski
Pamela Ann Rymer
Atsushi Wallace Tashima
Susan Graber
M. Margaret McKeown
Raymond C. Fisher
Johnnie B. Rawlinson

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JOHN DOE I, indi v. dually as Administrator of the Estate of his deceased child Baby Doe I, on behalf of all others similarly situated; Jane Doe, I, on behalf of herself, as Administratrix of the Estate of her deceased child Baby Doe I, on behalf of all others similarly situated; John Doe II; John Doe III; John Doe IV; John Doe V; Jane Doe II; Jane Doe III; John Doe VI; John Doe VII; John Doe VIII; John Doe IX; John Doe X; John Doe XI, on behalf of themsel

ORDER

The parties' stipulated motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197) are dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own costs.

The Appellants' Unopposed Motion to Vacate District Court Opinion, a motion in which Appellees join, is GRANTED. The district court opinion in Doe v. Unocal Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D.Cal. 2000), is VACATED.

Comments