Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dagoberto LARA-TORRES; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners, v. Alberto GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. Dagoberto Lara-Torres; Erika Lara-Perez, Petitioners,

ORDER

The majority opinion filed September 8, 2004, slip op. 12991, and appearing at 383 F.3d 968 (9th Cir. 2004), is hereby amended as follows:

1. Page 974, at end of second full paragraph, after citation to Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 900-01, insert: "While this temporal distinction may not always be significant, in this case, Pineda's allegedly ineffective assistance did not undermine the fairness of the removal proceedings in part because it was given well before the prospect of a hearing materialized."
2. Page 975, at end of first paragraph: change "removed from the actual process itself" to "which does not undermine the fairness of the actual process itself"

With these amendments, Judge McKeown has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judges Wallace and Moskowitz have so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed.R.App.P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED. No subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LARA-TORRES v. GONZALES
(Apr 21, 2005)