Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Marcia V. HANSEN, Respondent, v. Gregory S. HANSEN, Appellant.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gregory S. Hansen (Husband) appeals from the trial court's judgment and decree (judgment) dissolving his marriage to Marcia V. Hansen (Wife). Husband alleges the trial court erred in its award of maintenance, allocation of debt, and award of attorney's fees on appeal.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. The judgment is supported by competent and substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HANSEN v. HANSEN
(Apr 26, 2005)