Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support convictions of depraved indifference murder ( see Penal Law § 125.25; People v. Payne, 3 NY3d 266) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree ( see Penal Law § 265.02), is not preserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v. Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v. Gibbons, 15 AD3d 196; People v. Gutierrez, 15 AD3d 502), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction ( see CPL 470.15 [c]; [6] [a]; People v. Gutierrez, supra).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence ( see CPL 470.15; People v. Martin, 8 AD3d 883).
The defendant's remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.