CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF U.S. v. LOCKYER

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 03-55166, 03-55169.

Attorney(S)

Stephen A. Bokat, Washington, DC, Bradley W. Kampas, Scott W. Oborne, Jackson Lewis LLP, Mark A. Johnson, Mark E. Reagan, Hooper, Lundy Bookman, Inc., San Francisco, CA, Plaintiffs-Appellees. Scott A. Kronland, Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin Demain, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Scott A. Kronland, Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin Demain, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenors-Appellants. Suzanne M. Ambrose, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Richard T. Waldow, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for for Defendants. Daniel V. Yager, McGuiness Williams, Denise F. Meiners, NLRB, Washington, DC, Amicus.

Judges

Robert R. Beezer
Raymond C. Fisher
Morrison C. England

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 03-55166, 03-55169.

Attorney(S)

Stephen A. Bokat, Washington, DC, Bradley W. Kampas, Scott W. Oborne, Jackson Lewis LLP, Mark A. Johnson, Mark E. Reagan, Hooper, Lundy Bookman, Inc., San Francisco, CA, Plaintiffs-Appellees. Scott A. Kronland, Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin Demain, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Scott A. Kronland, Altshuler Berzon Nussbaum Rubin Demain, San Francisco, CA, for Intervenors-Appellants. Suzanne M. Ambrose, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the California Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, Richard T. Waldow, Deputy Atty. Gen., Office of the California Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA, for for Defendants. Daniel V. Yager, McGuiness Williams, Denise F. Meiners, NLRB, Washington, DC, Amicus.

Judges

Robert R. Beezer
Raymond C. Fisher
Morrison C. England

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES; California Chamber of Commerce; Employers Group; California Healthcare Association; California Manufacturers and Technology Assn.; California Association of Health Facilities; California Association of Home Ser v. ces for the Aging; Bettec Corporation; Marksherm Corporation; Zilaco Inc., Zilaco; Del Rio Healthcare, Inc.; Be

ORDER

The Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED, and the case shall be resubmitted as of the date of this order, without additional oral argument. The panel's opinion is withdrawn and shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the panel upon rehearing.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments