AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

FROST LINE REFRIGERATION, INC., et al., Appellants, v. ROBERT FRUNZI et al., Respondents.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contentions, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in striking their complaint. Although striking a pleading pursuant to CPLR 3126 is a drastic remedy, it is warranted where a party's conduct is shown to be willful, contumacious, or in bad faith ( see Beneficial Mtge. Corp. v. Lawrence, 5 AD3d 339). Here, the willful and contumacious character of the plaintiffs' failure to respond to discovery could be inferred from their refusal to comply with the defendants' discovery request for over three years after the date set forth in a preliminary conference order, as well as the inadequate explanation offered to excuse their failure to comply ( see Kihl v. Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118; Ali v. Kring, 272 AD2d 422; Brady v. County of Nassau, 234 AD2d 408).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FROST LINE REFRIGERATION, INC. v. FRUNZI
(May 23, 2005)