AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

In the Matter of ALFONZO QUINNEY, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

During a fight in the yard involving numerous inmates, a correction officer observed petitioner make a stabbing motion toward another inmate and, after he ignored orders to stop fighting, the correction officer saw him discard an object which turned out to be a sharpened spoon. Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, engaging in violent conduct, disturbing the order of the facility, refusing a direct order and possessing a weapon. He was found guilty of all of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing. After the determination was upheld on administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony adduced at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Brown v. Selsky, 5 AD3d 905, 906; Matter of Lunney v. Selsky, 275 AD2d 820). Any discrepancies in the testimony of the various witnesses presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Connell v. Goord, 298 AD2d 748, 748; Matter of Rucano v. Goord, 264 AD2d 888, 888). Moreover, we find no merit to petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias ( see Matter of Jackson v. Smith, 13 AD3d 685, 686, lv denied 4 NY3d 707; Matter of Edwards v. Goord, 12 AD3d 1002, 1003) nor that gaps in the tape prevents meaningful judicial review ( see Matter of Wilson v. Coombe, 237 AD2d 831). Petitioner's remaining claims are either unpreserved for review or are lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN THE MATTER OF QUINNEY v. SELSKY
(May 26, 2005)