Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.
Generally, the issue of whether a dangerous or defective condition exists depends on the particular facts of each case, and is properly a question of fact for the jury ( see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976). In determining whether a defect is trivial, a court must examine all the facts presented, including the width, depth, elevation, irregularity, and appearance of the defect, along with the time, place, and circumstances of the injury ( see Trincere v. County of Suffolk, supra; Smith v. A.B.K. Apts., 284 AD2d 323; Sanna v. Wal-Mart Stores, 271 AD2d 595).
Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, it cannot be concluded, as a matter of law, that the alleged defect upon which the plaintiff Arlene Friedman tripped and fell was of such a trivial nature that it could not give rise to legal liability on the part of the defendants ( see Corrado v. City of New York, 6 AD3d 380; Lobsenzer v. Mintz, 283 AD2d 556; Reeves v. New York City Tr. Auth., 276 AD2d 543).
Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been denied.