AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

RAJN CORPORATION, Respondent, v. LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Also Known as LS CORP., et al., Appellants.

Defendants have not offered a reasonable excuse for their failure to oppose plaintiff's motion, pursuant to CPLR 3126, to strike their answer ( see Grieco v. Walker, 8 AD3d 66). Nor have they attempted to explain their failure and refusal to respond to court-ordered discovery, or their failure to appear at the inquest. In the absence of a reasonable excuse, denial of the motion to vacate the default judgment was a provident exercise of discretion ( Silverman Weinraub v. Gillon, 1 AD3d 142).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RAJN CORP. v. LS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC
(Jun 7, 2005)