Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Since the defendant failed to satisfy its burden of establishing "both a likelihood of success in the action and the absence of a valid defense to its claim" ( Orix Credit Alliance v. Grace Indus., 232 AD2d 537; see Stoll Am. Knitting Mach. v. Creative Knitwear Corp., 5 AD3d 586, 587; Zweng v. Thompson, 283 AD2d 641), the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for an order of seizure ( see CPLR 7102 [d]).
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit ( see Shaheen v. Webster Realty Assoc., 16 AD3d 663; J A Vending v. J.A.M. Vending, 303 AD2d 370, 374).