Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the defendant Patchogue-Medford, New York School District, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.
Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision ( see Mirand v. City of New York, 84 NY2d 44). However, a school is not an insurer of the safety of its students for it cannot be reasonably expected to continuously supervise and control all of the students' movements and activities ( see Moody v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 8 AD3d 639; Hauser v. North Rockland Cent. School Dist. No. 1, 166 AD2d 553).
The defendant Patchogue-Medford, New York School District (hereinafter the School District), made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it provided adequate supervision and that the level of supervision was not a proximate cause of the infant plaintiff's accident ( see Weinblatt v. Eastchester Union Free School Dist., 303 AD2d 581; Lynch v. City of Yonkers, 292 AD2d 572; Davidson v. Sachem Cent. School Dist., 300 AD2d 276; Lopez v. Freeport Union Free School Dist., 288 AD2d 355; Chambers v. Roosevelt Union Free School Dist., 260 AD2d 594). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact.
Accordingly, the School District's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it should have been granted.