Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

SENORINO R. CRUZ. et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Case No. C 02-1942-CRB Case No. C 02-1943-CRB Case No. C 02-1944-CRB.

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT

CHARLES BREYER, District Judge

Now before the Court is plaintiff's Rule 59(e) motion to alter judgment. Pursuant to this Court's Amended Memorandum and Order Re: Mexican Defendants Motion to Dismiss, filed June 15, 2005, the judgment entered in this case on March 30, 2005 is hereby VACATED.

In addition to the reasons stated for altering judgment in the concurrently-filed Memorandum and Order, the Court further hereby clarifies the status of claims against the United States. Those claims, which are contained in the Third Amended Complaint, have not yet been subject to a motion to dismiss and therefore entry of judgment in favor of the United States was error.

All parties are further ORDERED to appear for a telephonic case management conference on Friday, June 24, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. to set a schedule for future motions to dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRUZ v. U.S
(Jun 16, 2005)